Civil proceedings in wartime: transformation of the institution of review of judicial decisions

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

The transformation of judicial decision review in wartime demonstrates the balancing act between legal procedures and real-world challenges.
Procedural adaptations include the introduction of remote judicial proceedings and changes in territorial jurisdiction to ensure access to justice.
The Supreme Court's practice emphasizes a flexible interpretation of procedural norms, recognizing wartime circumstances as valid grounds for renewing deadlines.
Ensuring the principles of the rule of law and access to justice during a state of emergency is crucial for the protection of human rights in Ukraine.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

The article examines the transformation of judicial decisions in Ukraine under martial law, highlighting challenges and procedural adaptations.

Парасюк et al. (2025) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

The article examines the transformation of judicial decisions in Ukraine under martial law, highlighting challenges and procedural adaptations.