Healthcare professionals’ experiences in using a patient-reported outcome tool (PRO-Pall) to identify symptoms and problems in palliative care: A mixed-methods study

Objectives This study aimed to investigate healthcare professionals’ experiences with using the PRO Palliative Care questionnaire (PRO-Pall) to identify palliative care symptoms and problems in non-specialized palliative care settings among patients with heart, lung, and kidney disease, and cancer. The study also investigated the PRO-Pall’s potential to ensure further initiatives and care. Methods A national, multicenter, observational study employing a mixed-methods approach. It includes quantitative analysis using an evaluation survey ( n = 286) and qualitative analysis from workshops ( n = 11). Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, while qualitative data were analyzed thematically. Results Quantitative and qualitative data were organized according to 3 a priori-defined themes: Theme 1: Assessment of palliative symptoms, Theme 2: Support for dialogue , and Theme 3: Timely initiation of initiatives and care. The evaluation survey and qualitative interviews with healthcare professionals indicated that it was valuable to use PRO-Pall in a non-specialist palliative context to screen for symptoms and problems, as well as to initiate actions. PRO-Pall helped to structure the dialogue and had a positive effect on the quality of the conversation. Significance of results The findings highlight that it can be valuable to utilize the PRO-Pall in general palliative care settings for patients with heart, lung, or kidney diseases as well as cancer. When implementing PRO-Pall in practice, it is crucial to carefully consider the entire process, from administering the questionnaire to planning initiatives informed by patients’ PRO responses.