Prospective observational study demonstrates significant pain reduction in patients with focal peripheral neuropathic pain, indicating the effectiveness of botulinum toxin A.
Neuropathic pain (NP) is frequently resistant to conventional treatments. Botulinum toxin type A (BT-A) is a recommended option for focal peripheral NP, but the dynamics of its effect in real-life conditions remain poorly characterized. To assess BT-A efficacy in a real-world study of patients with focal peripheral NP, over a 1-year follow-up period. In this prospective, observational study, adult patients with chronic focal peripheral NP refractory to standard therapies were treated with BT-A in two French pain centers. Injections were individualized and administered at approximately 3-month intervals. The primary outcome was the patient-reported percentage of improvement since the first injection, assessed at each follow-up visit (Cycles 2-5). Secondary outcomes included the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), average pain intensity over the previous 8 days, and exploratory analysis of response trajectories distinguishing early (≥ 30% improvement at Cycle 3) from late responders. Eighty-two patients received ≥ 2 BT-A cycles. Mean self-reported improvement increased from 30.7% at Cycle 2 to 51.0% at Cycle 5 (p < 0.001). PGIC and pain intensity also showed significant improvements. Among 59 patients evaluable at Cycle 3, 66% were early responders; late responders showed significant benefit after the third injection. BT-A was well tolerated: 63.6% reported end-of-dose effects, and 25.8% experienced only mild, transient adverse events. This real-life study over 1 year suggests that BT-A provides progressive and sustained benefit in focal peripheral NP, supporting continued treatment beyond two cycles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Solecruz et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: