Retrospective analysis identifies key predictors of treatment response and overall survival in ES-SCLC patients, suggesting personalized treatment options.
Introduction Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. This study aimed to identify and validate clinical and laboratory biomarkers for predicting treatment response and overall survival (OS) in ES-SCLC patients. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 101 ES-SCLC patients receiving first-line treatment. Logistic and Cox regression analyses identified independent factors influencing treatment efficacy and OS. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare white blood cell (WBC) changes between chemotherapy-alone and chemo-immunotherapy groups. Predictive models were constructed and evaluated via cross-validation, ROC, and calibration curves. Differential expression of key proteins (neuron-specific enolase (NSE), fibrinogen (FIB), and gastrin-releasing peptide precursor (ProGRP)) was validated using GEO database data. Results Pre-chemotherapy tumor size and post-cycle 2 FIB levels were independent predictors of treatment efficacy. Pre-chemotherapy WBC count, pre-chemotherapy D-dimer, and post-cycle 2 ProGRP were independent risk factors for OS. The predictive models demonstrated strong performance. Subgroup analysis showed no significant difference in WBC changes between treatment regimens (mean change: -2.30 ± 2.47 vs. -2.08 ± 2.45, p=0.659). GEO data confirmed the differential expression of FIB and ProGRP. Discussion Our findings establish robust and validated models based on readily available clinical metrics (tumor size, WBC, D-dimer, FIB, ProGRP) to predict outcomes in ES-SCLC, which could aid in personalizing treatment strategies. The stability of WBC trends across therapies strengthens the prognostic value of baseline WBC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: