Improved YOLOv8s detects lifting hooks and safety latches with 90.4% mAP, indicating advanced safety monitoring.
Lifting hooks equipped with safety latches are critical terminal components of lifting machinery. The safety condition of this component is a crucial factor in preventing load dislodgement during lifting operations. To achieve intelligent monitoring of the hook and the safety latch, precise identification of these components is a crucial initial step. In this study, we propose an improved YOLOv8s detection model called YOLO-HOOK. To reduce computational complexity while simultaneously maintaining precision, the model incorporates an Efficient_Light_C2f module, which integrates a Convolutional Gated Linear Unit (CGLU) with Star Blocks. The neck network utilizes Multi-Scale Efficient Cross-Stage Partial (MSEICSP) to improve edge feature extraction capabilities under complex lighting conditions and multi-scale variations. Furthermore, a HOOK_IoU loss function was designed to optimize bounding box regression through auxiliary bounding boxes, and a piecewise linear mapping strategy was used to improve localization precision for challenging targets. The results of ablation studies and comparative analyses indicate that the YOLO-HOOK secured mAP scores of 90.4% at an Intersection over Union (IoU) threshold of 0.5 and 71.6% across the 0.5–0.95 IoU span, thereby eclipsing the YOLOv8s reference model by margins of 4.6% and 5.4%, respectively. Furthermore, it manifested a paramount precision of 97.0% alongside a commendable recall rate of 83.4%. The model parameters were reduced to 9.6 M, the computational complexity was controlled at 31.0 Giga Floating-point Operations Per Second (GFLOPs), and the inference speed reached 310 frames per second (FPS), balancing a lightweight design with excellent performance. These findings offer a technical approach for the intelligent recognition of hooks and safety latches during lifting operations, thus aiding in refining the safety management of lifting operations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: