Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review highlights self-monitoring's role in leadership and workplace dynamics, suggesting improvements for low and high self-monitors.
Self-monitoring research poses a challenge to conventional treatments of personality due to its focus on the extent to which people adapt their self-presentations to the demands of social situations. The adaptable self, characteristic of a high self-monitoring orientation, contrasts with the principled self, characteristic of a low self-monitoring orientation. We review research linking self-monitoring to careers, leadership, workplace social networks, authenticity, and deception. We outline future research paths related to agency, top management, and cross-cultural outcomes. We conclude with practical suggestions for how low self-monitors can enhance their workplace outcomes, how high self-monitors can avoid overengagement in projects, and how managers can facilitate people's careers in light of self-monitoring differences. The self-monitoring research program opens avenues of exploration on vital issues concerned with careers, leadership, status, and performance in workplace settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kilduff et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: