This essay examines tainted commemorations and proposes state-ordained decapitation as a solution, highlighting its implications for memorial practices and societal values.
This essay explores the controversy surrounding tainted commemorations, specifically statues honouring individuals associated with racism, colonialism, and oppression. Focusing on the removal of a Christopher Columbus statue in Boston during the Black Lives Matter movement, I present common responses to tainted commemorations and propose state-ordained decapitation as an alternative solution. I begin by outlining the concept of tainted commemorations as well as some of the common solutions to these statues: removal, counter-commemorations, and contextualizing plaques. However, I argue that state-ordained decapitation satisfies both Chong-Ming Lim’s (2020) preservationist and self-respect desideratum, while additionally overcoming aesthetic and organizational drawbacks seen in alternative solutions. Further, I respond to objections, addressing economic concerns, distinguishing state-ordained decapitation from vandalism, and proposing limitations to prevent potential misuse of governmental power. Overall, I conclude that decapitation is a feasible response to tainted commemorations, while additionally acknowledging the need for a nuanced approach based on diverse monumental typologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nathan Tillo (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: