Rasch Analysis highlights differential item functioning in CARS1 among children with autism spectrum disorder, suggesting potential biases due to age and gender.
Purpose Our study used Rasch Analysis to examine the psychometric properties of the Children Autism Rating Scale First Edition (CARS1) in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Methods The Partial Credit Model (PCM) was used to test reliability and validity. The GPCMlasso Model was used to test the differential item functioning (DIF). Results The response pattern of this sample showed acceptable fitness for the PCM. This analysis supports the unidimensionality assumption of the CARS1. Disordered category functions and DIF were found for all items in CARS1. Performance can be related to age group, gender, symptom classification, and autistic symptoms. Conclusion Rasch analysis provides reliable evidence to support the clinical application of the CARS1. Some items may produce inaccurate measurements originating from unreasonable category structures. Differences in age group, sex, and symptom classification can be related to test performance and may lead to unnecessary bias. Hence, clinical applications may require additional consideration of population characteristics to draw reliable conclusions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: