Analysis reveals risky asset-liability mismatches and lax supervision in the silicon valley bank collapse.
Against rising interest rates, high inflation, and financial difficulties in the technology sector, the second largest bank bankruptcy in US history - the Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) bank run - occurred. What factors led to this bank run? First, we analyze SVB's balance sheet. We find that SVB's portfolio is risky because of a large duration mismatch between assets and liabilities. Second, there is a discussion of the impact of incomplete and lax supervision of the SVB. Third, after the risk of catastrophic loss became abundantly clear, the human element of self-interest of executives played a subtle but important role in leaving the asset-liability mismatch in place.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sui et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: