Analysis reveals YOLOv5 has the highest accuracy while YOLOv8n excels in inference speed for urban road conditions.
Objectives: This study evaluates the performance of YOLO object detection models, from YOLOv5 to YOLOv10, in detecting vehicles, pedestrians, and traffic signs in road environments, with a focus on their applicability to real-time autonomous driving. Theoretical Framework: The research builds on the evolution of YOLO as a leading single-stage object detection framework, which is recognized for balancing accuracy and speed compared to traditional two-stage methods. Method: A custom dataset of 5,950 annotated images collected under diverse weather and illumination conditions was used to train and evaluate the models. Performance was assessed using precision, recall, F1-score, mean Average Precision (mAP), and inference time, with preprocessing carried out in Roboflow and experiments executed on Google Colab with GPU support. Results and Discussion: The results show that YOLOv5x achieved the highest accuracy, with a mAP of 76.2% and an F1-score of 77.34%, while YOLOv8n demonstrated the fastest inference time at 2.2 milliseconds. Persistent challenges were identified in detecting small objects and addressing dataset class imbalance, which significantly affected performance. Research Implications: The findings highlight the need for dataset balancing and careful model selection to improve detection in autonomous driving applications. Originality/Value: This study offers a comprehensive comparison of YOLO versions in urban road environments, providing valuable insights for researchers and practitioners in intelligent transportation systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ikmel et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: