Experimental analysis reveals defensive mimicry in two insect species, suggesting complex interactions. Findings indicate anti-predator benefits for rove beetles while assassin bug nymphs maintain superior defenses.
Defensive mimicry encompasses a continuum ranging from Batesian to Müllerian mimicry. Batesian mimicry involves antagonistic interactions between undefended and defended species, whereas Müllerian mimicry represents mutualistic interactions between species with comparable levels of defense. When mimicry occurs between species with unequal defensive abilities, it is termed quasi-Batesian mimicry, though whether such interactions are antagonistic or mutualistic remains debated. Despite their common occurrence in nature, few quasi-Batesian mimicry systems have been experimentally studied. Here, we investigated the mimetic interaction between two chemically defended insect species, the rove beetle Paederus fuscipes Curtis, 1826 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) and the assassin bug Sirthenea flavipes (Stål, 1855) (Hemiptera: Reduviidae), through behavioral assays with their potential predator, the pond frog Pelophylax nigromaculatus (Hallowell, 1861) (Anura: Ranidae), which naturally co-occurs with these insects in Japan. Adult P. fuscipes resemble S. flavipes nymphs in their conspicuous reddish-orange and black coloration. Under laboratory conditions, 45.8% of pond frogs rejected P. fuscipes adults, whereas 70.8% rejected S. flavipes nymphs, suggesting that the assassin bug nymphs are better defended. Prior exposure to S. flavipes increased frog rejection of P. fuscipes, whereas exposure to P. fuscipes slightly reduced rejection of S. flavipes. These results indicate that adult P. fuscipes may gain protective benefits from mimicry of S. flavipes nymphs, while the latter may incur a small cost.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sugiura et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: