Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Assessment reveals higher bite pressure in natural teeth compared to implant-supported prostheses, suggesting better proprioceptive feedback.
A comparative analysis of the bite pressure between the mandibular first molars region using implant-supported prostheses and the contralateral side natural teeth is of interest. NUPAI and T-Scan III systems were used in the assessment of thirty-five patients. Data shows that maximum (34.2 vs 28.7 MPa) and average bite pressures (25.8 vs 21.4 MPa) and their contact areas (28.4 vs 24.1 mm 2) were noticeably greater on the natural tooth side (p < 0.05). The males showed an 18 percent higher bite power and differences were observed with age. Thus, natural teeth are better than implants because of proprioceptive feedback, which justifies the importance of appropriate adjustment of occlusion in implant prosthodontics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dey et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: