Quasi-experimental study shows improved vocabulary comprehension and engagement in EFL students using context clues.
The purpose of this study was to: (1) assess the effectiveness of context clue strategies in learning Business English vocabulary, (2) compare students' vocabulary comprehension before and after instruction, and (3) examine students' perceptions and engagement. This quasi-experimental study used a one-group pretest-posttest design with 30 third-semester business administration students selected through purposive sampling. The intervention was conducted over six weeks (three hours per week), covering Business Result Pre-intermediate (Units 1–6). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, paired t-tests, and effect size calculations. Statistical results showed: (1) Strategy performance (E₁/E₂ = 85.67/82.23) surpassed the criterion of 80/80; (2) Post-instruction scores (M = 24.67, SD = 2.85) were significantly higher than pre-instruction scores (M = 18.73, SD = 3.42), t = -8.94, p < .001, with a very large effect size (Cohen's d = 1.94); and (3) Students expressed strongly agreed regarding the strategy's effectiveness (M = 4.24, SD = 0.65) and demonstrated high levels of engagement (M = 4.18, SD = 0.63). The findings demonstrate that context clue strategies significantly contribute to business English vocabulary learning and enhance student engagement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rungsan Lakhamja (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: