This cohort study evaluates survival rates and key morbidities in extremely preterm infants, suggesting improved care is needed.
Background: Outcomes of extremely preterm (EPT) infants in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) remain heterogeneous, with limited gestational age (GA)-defined data from India. Objective: To evaluate survival, short-term morbidities, and predictors of mortality among infants born ≤28 weeks' gestation in a North Indian tertiary neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Methods: This prospective observational cohort included all inborn infants ≤28 weeks admitted between November 2020 and October 2021, excluding those with major anomalies. Maternal, perinatal, and neonatal data were collected prospectively. The primary outcome was survival to discharge; secondary outcomes included major morbidities. Predictors of mortality were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Results: Eighty-three infants were enrolled (median GA 27.0 weeks (IQR 26.3-27.9); median birth weight 892 g (IQR 731-1021)). Overall survival to discharge was 61.4%, with survival increasing with gestational age. Sepsis (37.5%) and extreme prematurity (40%) were leading causes of death. Major morbidities included sepsis (61.4%), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at 36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) (41.5% any grade, 15.1% moderate-severe), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) ≥ stage II (13.3%), severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) (12.0%), and treatment-requiring retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) (7.8%). In adjusted analysis, higher birth weight (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.59 per 100 g increase; 95% CI 0.37-0.94) and higher five-minute Apgar score (aOR 0.25 per point; 95% CI 0.13-0.48) independently predicted survival. The final model demonstrated excellent discrimination (area under the curve (AUC) 0.89, 95% CI 0.83-0.96). Conclusions: Survival of EPT infants in this Indian cohort was higher than pooled LMIC estimates but remained lower than high-income benchmarks. Birth weight and five-minute Apgar score were the strongest predictors of outcome. Strengthening perinatal care, infection prevention, and standardized neonatal practices may further improve outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khandelwal et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: