Descriptive cross-sectional study reveals characteristics and motivations of non-urgent patients, implying significant perceptions influence ED visits.
Background: In many countries, emergency departments (EDs) are overcrowded by self-referred, non-urgent patients, leading to strained resources. Understanding why patients with minor ailments choose secondary or tertiary EDs is vital. Aim: This study aimed to describe patients’ characteristics and reasons for self-referrals for non-urgent conditions to the ED of a tertiary hospital in Kimberley, South Africa. Setting: The study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Kimberley. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study involved patients at Kimberley’s Family Medicine ED (Gateway Centre). Participants completed a self-administered questionnaire with staff available to explain. Results: A total of 331 participants were interviewed; the mean age was 40 years (ranging from 18–89 years); most were males (199; 60.1%), ≤ 45 years (226; 68.3%), single (171; 51.7%), unemployed (181; 54.7%), had no medical insurance (306; 92.5%) and had no access to a private doctor (298; 90.0%). Most had access to primary healthcare (PHC) clinics (291; 87.9%). They perceived their medical conditions as severe enough to visit the casualty department (310; 93.7%). They were more familiar with the services at the ED than their local clinics (169; 75.5%). Conclusion: Non-urgent ED visits by self-referred patients result from complex medical, psychosocial, and economic factors. Despite access to PHC, patients often prefer the ED due to perceived severity and familiarity with hospital services. Contribution: Patients’ perceptions significantly influence their healthcare choices. Addressing these perceptions is key to reducing the burden on already strained emergency services.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fagbiye et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: