Systematic review evaluates low-carbohydrate diets managing type 2 diabetes in Eastern and Western populations, highlighting potential cultural influences.
Low-carbohydrate diets (LCDs) have emerged as a potential dietary intervention for managing glycemic control, but their effectiveness across different cultural contexts remains unclear. To evaluate the efficacy of LCDs in managing type 2 diabetes, with attention to cultural context, and to clarify how variability in carbohydrate definitions affects interpretation. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus from inception to 1 August 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) ≥ 12 weeks in adults with type 2 diabetes. We conducted exploratory analyses by Eastern versus Western setting and dose-response meta-regression using actual carbohydrate intake at the follow-up. Twenty-seven RCTs (n = 2,870; 7 Eastern, 20 Western) were included. Across analyzed time points, no arm sustained carbohydrate intake < 10 % of total energy; therefore, findings generalize to low-to-moderate carbohydrate rather than very-low-carbohydrate. LCDs improved glycemia short-term: HbA1c - 0.29 %, with the largest effect at 3 months. Fasting blood glucose decreased overall (-7.12 mg/dL). Weight loss was greatest at 3 months and attenuated thereafter. At 3 months, lower actual carbohydrate intake was related to larger HbA1c and weight reductions. LCDs offer modest, short-term metabolic benefits for type 2 diabetes management, but benefits diminish over time. Cultural context may shape responses, underscoring individualized, culturally tailored care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mongkolsucharitkul et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: