This study reveals how quenching temperature affects hardness in martensitic stainless steel 90Cr18MoV, suggesting carbide interaction is crucial.
In this study, we utilized Thermo-Calc software (2023a) to optimize the heat treatment process of martensitic stainless steel 90Cr18MoV through phase diagram calculations. The microhardness of 90Cr18MoV was characterized using a nanoindentation instrument. The microstructural morphology of the samples was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The composition of the samples was characterized through scanning electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). Additionally, laser confocal microscopy (FIB) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were employed to characterize the precipitate phase composition and size before and after heat treatment, while also observing the dislocation structure within the samples. The relationship between the quenching temperature and the percentage of residual austenite content in the material was established. The influence of the dislocation structure and precipitate size on the hardness of the samples was investigated. The research findings confirm that the observed secondary hardening phenomenon in tempered samples is attributed to the co-precipitation of two types of carbides, M23C6 and MC, within the matrix. The study investigated the effects of the tempering temperature and duration on the size of secondary precipitates, indicating that M23C6 and MC particles with sizes less than or equal to 20 nm contribute to enhancing the matrix, while particles larger than 30 nm lead to a reduction in hardness after tempering. Notably, during the tempering process, M23C6 precipitated from the matrix nucleates on MC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: