Experimental analysis shows varied responses in seedling quality based on substrate and tube volume, indicating optimal conditions for four species.
The production of seedlings of fast-growing native species in unfavorable areas is essential for the ecological restoration, making it crucial to evaluate the responses of these species to different substrate compositions and tube sizes to optimize the seedling production. Thus, the objective was to evaluate the seedling production of Vernonia polyanthes Less., Solanum paniculatum L., Baccharis dracunculifolia DC. and Solanum lycocarpum St. Hil. using different substrate compositions and tube volumes. Three substrate formulations were evaluated, consisting of commercial substrate, coconut fiber, carbonized rice husk, and cattle manure in different proportions, combined with two tube volumes (55 and 110 cm³). The experiment followed a randomized block design with treatments arranged in a 3 × 2 factorial scheme (substrates × tube volumes). The seedlings were assessed by measuring height, stem diameter, and dry matter, in addition to calculating the height/diameter ratio, shoot-to-root ratio, and Dickson quality index. Superior results were obtained with the 110 cm³ tube compared to the 55 cm³ tube, the seedlings of V. polyanthes, S. paniculatum, B. dracunculifolia, and S. lycocarpum achieved Dickson Quality Index (DQI) averages of 0.97, 2.12, 0.37, and 2.01, respectively. The substrate composition distinctly influenced the development of each species. For S. paniculatum, any of the tested substrates proved suitable, whereas for V. polyanthes and B. dracunculifolia, a substrate containing 15% cattle manure was more favorable. In contrast, S. lycocarpum performed best with 30% cattle manure. It is concluded that high-quality seedlings of the four studied species can be produced using 110 cm³ tubes and alternative substrates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Souza et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: