PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 12, 2025Journal of Engineering and Applied Science17 citationsOpen Access

Interpretable machine learning for predicting compression index of clays using SHAP and gradient boosting models

View Full Paper
KHKhaled HamdaouiABAli BenzaamiaBABillal Sari Ahmed

Key Points

  • XGBoost achieved the highest prediction performance, with an R2 of 0.913 on the test set.
  • The model revealed initial void ratio and water content as the most influential factors in predicting compression index.
  • Fivefold cross-validation and hyperparameter optimization were employed to enhance model accuracy.
  • The framework addresses limitations of traditional AI, increasing transparency and offering efficiency in geotechnical assessments.

Abstract

Abstract This study introduces a novel, interpretable machine learning framework for predicting the compression index (Cc) of clay soils by integrating three advanced gradient boosting algorithms—XGBoost, CatBoost, and LightGBM—with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). A comprehensive dataset of 1,243 clay samples, compiled from peer-reviewed literature, includes four geotechnical input variables: plastic limit (PL), plasticity index (PI), initial void ratio (e₀) and water content (w). Data were standardized and partitioned into training (70%) and testing (30%) subsets. Model development employed fivefold cross-validation and Optuna-based hyperparameter optimization. Among the models, XGBoost demonstrated the highest generalization capability, achieving an R 2 of 0.913, RMSE of 0.197, and MAE of 0.100 on the test set. SHAP analysis revealed that initial void ratio (e₀) and water content (w) were the most influential features, with mean SHAP values of 0.20 and 0.10, respectively, aligning with established geotechnical principles. The proposed framework enhances transparency in machine learning predictions by making the model’s decision process understandable, thereby addressing the limitations of traditional “black-box” AI. It offers a reliable and efficient alternative to conventional oedometer testing, particularly beneficial for preliminary geotechnical design where timely and interpretable predictions are essential. Graphical Abstract

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hamdaoui et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d44f7331b076d99fa56b21https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-025-00727-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper