Systematic review assesses accuracy of FINDRISC against oral glucose tolerance test for type 2 diabetes, indicating its potential effectiveness.
to determine the accuracy of the FINDRISC score compared with the oral glucose tolerance test for the detection of type 2 diabetes (T2D). This systematic review and meta-analysis involved electronic search in: Embase, Scopus, Medline, WoS, and Cochrane, from inception to November 2024. QUADAS-2 was employed to assess the risk of bias, and the certainty of evidence with the GRADE approach. A bivariate hierarchical random effects model was performed and the sensitivity, specificity, and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) along with the summary ROC curve, were calculated. 25 cross-sectional studies and 7 cohort studies were included. The individual FINDRISC cut-off between 9 and 15 points was analysed. The AUC ranged between 0.694 and 0.755, sensitivity between 53.1% (95% CI 38.9-66.8) and 84.7% (95% CI 72.7-92.0), while the false positive rate (FPR) ranged from 21.8% (95% CI 12.9-34.3) to 54.8% (95% CI 38.0-70.5). The FINDRISC scores of 9 and 10 points show the best effectiveness for screening T2D, with moderate and low quality of evidence respectively. Although the cut-off of 12 points has lower sensitivity, it significantly reduces the FPR and increase the specificity with moderate quality of evidence. Private institutional own resources. PROSPERO (CRD42020189768).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Acosta‐Reyes et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: