Randomized controlled trial shows group-based cognitive therapy improves psychological distress in adolescents, suggesting early intervention benefits.
This study investigated the effects of group-based low-intensity cognitive behavioural therapy (GB-LiCBT) on alleviating distress, depression, and anxiety among adolescents. A waitlist randomized controlled trial was conducted between October 2021 and July 2022 and involved 136 young people aged 12-24 years (69.9% female) from the LevelMind@JC project, a large-scale community youth mental health initiative. The participants were randomly assigned to receive either 6-8 weekly sessions of GB-LiCBT (n = 70) or wait until week 12 before receiving GB-LiCBT (n = 66). The assessments were conducted at baseline (T0), week 8 (T1), and week 12 (T2). The primary outcomes were depressive and anxiety symptoms, psychological distress, and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) using intention-to-treat. Compared with the control group, intention-to-treat analysis revealed that the GB-LiCBT group demonstrated significant improvements in T0-T1 HR-QoL and T0-T2 future outlook. These results were supported by the per-protocol analysis, which additionally showed significant improvements in the T0-T1 psychological distress scores. Subgroup analysis revealed a more pronounced GB-LiCBT effect on T0-T1 psychological distress among participants aged ≤18 years and females. Correlation analysis among GB-LiCBT participants found that improved mindful attention linked to reduced anxiety and distress, whereas improved self-esteem linked to reduced distress and improved HR-QoL. Although GB-LiCBT had a limited effect on specific depressive and anxiety symptoms, it was effective in improving HR-QoL. Reductions in psychological distress were observed primarily among younger participants and females. These findings suggest the potential of GB-LiCBT as a suitable early intervention for individuals experiencing early stages of elevated psychological distress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hui et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: