PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 16, 2025Annals of Pharmacotherapy2 citations

The Combination of Aztreonam-Avibactam in Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections

View Full Paper
MRMaria Roye-AzarMPMary Anne PraterCGChristopher Giuliano

Key Points

  • Aztreonam-avibactam exhibited a clinical cure rate of 76.4% in complicated intra-abdominal infections compared to 74% with meropenem.
  • For hospital-acquired pneumonia, aztreonam-avibactam showed a 45.9% cure rate, slightly higher than the 41.7% seen with meropenem.
  • The review evaluated multiple databases, focusing on pharmacology and safety data for aztreonam-avibactam in treating serious infections.
  • Despite showing promise, further studies on aztreonam-avibactam's role in treating various infections are necessary to solidify its clinical use.

Abstract

Aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI) is used for difficult-to-treat gram-negative infections. The objective of this review is to analyze the pharmacology, safety, and clinical application of ATM-AVI. PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched using the terms aztreonam avibactam, PF-06947387, Emblaveo, and ATM-AVI. Articles written in English and published from January 1, 1985, to June 10, 2025, that related to pharmacology, safety, clinical trials, and clinical application of ATM-AVI were reviewed. The ATM-AVI has shown similar efficacy to comparator antibiotics in complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) and hospital/ventilator-acquired pneumonia (HAP/VAP). The REVISIT trial showed cIAI clinical cure rates of 76.4% and 74% for the ATM-AVI and meropenem groups, respectively (treatment difference 2.4% 95% confidence interval, CI = -7.4 to 13.0). For HAP/VAP, clinical cure rates were 45.9% and 41.7% for the ATM-AVI and meropenem groups, respectively (treatment difference 4.3% 95% CI = -15.1 to 23.1). The ATM-AVI was generally well tolerated, with hepatic adverse effects being the most commonly reported.Relevance to patient care and clinical practice comparison to existing drugs:The ATM-AVI has demonstrated clinical efficacy for the treatment of cIAI. However, its role needs to be further studied for other infections such as HAP/VAP, urinary tract, and other serious infections. Pharmacoeconomic analysis may be needed to assess the cost-benefit impact in the United States. The ATM-AVI may be an alternative option for the treatment of cIAI and other complicated gram-negative infections. Further studies are needed to delineate the role of ATM-AVI in clinical practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Roye-Azar et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d44f8331b076d99fa570aehttps://doi.org/10.1177/10600280251366033
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Infectious Diseases Society of America 2024 Guidance on the Treatment of Antimicrobial-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections2024 · 1,107 citations
  2. 2Avibactam and Class C β-Lactamases: Mechanism of Inhibition, Conservation of the Binding Pocket, and Implications for Resistance2014 · 194 citations
  3. 3EE34 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Aztreonam-Avibactam (ATM-AVI) Versus Meropenem for the Treatment of Serious Infections Due to Gram-Negative Bacteria for Which There Are Limited Treatment Options (LTO) in Italy2023 · 2 citations
  4. 4A review of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of aztreonam2016 · 109 citations
  5. 5Pharmacokinetics and safety of aztreonam/avibactam for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in hospitalized adults: results from the REJUVENATE study2019 · 124 citations