Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales represent a major antimicrobial-resistance threat because MBLs hydrolyse most clinically used β-lactams and are not inhibited by currently approved serine β-lactamase inhibitors. Aztreonam–avibactam (ATM-AVI; Emblaveo®) addresses this therapeutic gap by combining aztreonam, a monobactam that is stable to MBL-mediated hydrolysis, with avibactam, which inhibits many co-produced class A, class C, and selected class D serine β-lactamases. This narrative review synthesizes evidence on ATM-AVI pharmacology, microbiological activity, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, safety, resistance, and regulatory positioning. Large surveillance datasets show high in vitro activity against most MBL-producing Enterobacterales, including many co-producing β-lactamases from multiple Ambler classes. Population pharmacokinetic modelling supports a renal-function-adjusted fixed 3:1 dosing ratio and more reliable joint target attainment than separately administered ceftazidime–avibactam plus aztreonam. In the phase 3 REVISIT trial, clinical cure with ATM-AVI was comparable to meropenem in the overall population; however, few participants had confirmed MBL-positive infections. Direct clinical evidence therefore remains limited, supported by convergent microbiological, pharmacokinetic, and observational data. Regulatory indications differ substantially between the European Union and the United States. ATM-AVI is an important advance for selected MBL-producing and multi-class-co-producing Gram-negative infections, but its long-term value will depend on targeted use, reliable susceptibility testing, continued surveillance, and further trials in the intended target population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ritiu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: