Cross-sectional validation of the LGBTQ+ HCES shows reliable measures of discrimination and inclusivity in Polish healthcare.
The Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer individuals frequently encounter disparities in healthcare access, quality and inclusivity. Despite growing awareness of these challenges, Poland has lacked a psychometrically validated tool to assess the experiences of sexual and gender minorities in clinical settings. This study aimed to develop and validate the LGBTQ+ Healthcare Experiences Scale (LGBTQ+ HCES) tailored to the Polish context. A multi-phase cross-sectional study was conducted in 2025. The initial pool of items was developed through a narrative literature review and refined by 4 researchers with clinical and academic experience in LGBTQ+ health. Content validity was assessed using a 2-round Delphi process involving a multidisciplinary panel of experts (n = 12), who rated item clarity and relevance using Aiken's V. A pilot test with 30 LGBTQ+ participants confirmed comprehension and technical usability. The final 15-item instrument, comprising 3 subscales (Respect and Inclusivity, Discrimination and Microaggressions, Trust and Comfort), was administered to 172 LGBTQ+ individuals recruited via social media. Psychometric evaluation included descriptive analysis, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and reliability testing (Cronbach's á, McDonald's ů). Confirmatory factor analysis supported a 3-factor model comprising Respect and Inclusivity, Discrimination and Microaggressions, and Trust and Comfort. Model fit indices met recommended thresholds (root mean square error of approximation = 0.041, standardized root mean square residual = 0.057, comparative fit index = 0.998). All subscales demonstrated acceptable to strong internal consistency (á = 0.745-0.778; ů = 0.92). No significant floor or ceiling effects were found to compromise the scale's performance. All items showed positive item-total correlations and contributed meaningfully to their respective subscales. The LGBTQ+ HCES is a valid, reliable and culturally grounded instrument for assessing healthcare experiences among LGBTQ+ populations in Poland. It holds promise for research, public health surveillance and health system quality improvement efforts to promote inclusive and equitable care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Czapla et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: