Half-longitudinal study shows changing attitudes influence sexual behaviours among men living with HIV, suggesting implications for safe sex self-efficacy.
In the era of 'Undetectable = Untransmittable' (U=U), reductions in condom use and increases in casual partnerships may contribute to elevated risks of coinfection with other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and HIV super-infections among men living with HIV. These trends may reflect a shift in personal attitudes towards sexual behaviour and HIV risk, yet their influence on actual behaviours remains unclear. To investigate how changes in personal attitudes and safe sex self-efficacy influence sexual decision-making. Two-wave longitudinal study design. We conducted a 3-month longitudinal study from March to December 2023 among HIV-positive men (≥ 18 years) initiating ART in Changsha, China. Cross-lagged panel analysis and half-longitudinal mediation analysis were used to examine how changes in personal attitudes influenced sexual behaviours. 427 men living with HIV were included at baseline, and 301 completed the follow-up survey. Sexual behaviours were associated with personal attitudes, namely safe sex fatigue, viral load/transmission beliefs, and sexual sensation seeking. More positive personal attitudes in these domains at baseline predicted lower safe sex self-efficacy over 3 months, while reduced baseline self-efficacy increased the likelihood of engaging in condomless sex and/or multiple sexual partners. All three personal attitude domains had significant indirect effects on sexual behaviours via safe sex self-efficacy. In the era of U=U, the changed personal attitudes among men living with HIV may lead to the increased likelihood of engaging in condomless sex and/or having multiple sexual partners, and safe sex self-efficacy serves as a mediator in this relationship. This study highlights the potential influence of attitudinal changes on sexual behaviours among men living with HIV in the 'U=U' era. Findings provide valuable evidence for developing more targeted interventions that address not only behavioural outcomes but also underlying personal attitudes. No patient or public contribution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: