Navigating Relational Uncertainty in Serial Arguments: The Roles of Perceived Resolvability and Taking Conflict Personally

Serial arguments are recurring relational conflicts characterized by unresolved issues and chronic distress. Integrating Relational Turbulence Theory (RTT) and the Serial Argument Process Model, this study examines how relational uncertainty indirectly influences conflict strategies through perceived resolvability and taking conflict personally (TCP). Survey results from 383 dating participants indicate relational uncertainty decreases perceived resolvability and increases TCP, promoting distributive and avoidant strategies and inhibiting integrative communication. Theoretically, this study extends previous research by identifying perceived resolvability and TCP as cognitive biases shaped by relational uncertainty, offering clearer insight into the mechanisms linking relationship dynamics and conflict behavior. Practically, results suggest that relationship educators and counselors should help partners recognize uncertainty-driven cognitive biases to enhance healthy communication patterns.