This analysis demonstrates relationships in drop size distributions and mixing types in diverse cloud environments, indicating significant entrainment-mixing effects.
Constraining the impacts of entrainment and associated mixing (i.e., entrainment-mixing) on cloud properties continues to be difficult, partly due to observational uncertainties as well as a lacking consensus of which methodologies for diagnosing entrainment-mixing are most appropriate. This study introduces a novel method to evaluate the presence and degree of inhomogeneous and homogeneous mixing using ~100 hours of in situ observations from a research aircraft over the Northeastern Atlantic. Specifically, drop size distributions are compared between regions containing negligible and significant entrainment for select flight legs, making a direct characterization of the degree of homogeneous and inhomogeneous mixing possible. A measure of drop concentration variance is used as a proxy variable to diagnose entrainment-mixing. Results correspond well with entrainment-mixing metrics, showing lower Damköhler numbers where drop size distributions shift towards smaller drop sizes (i.e., inhomogeneous mixing) and greater transition length scales where drop size distributions do not (i.e., homogeneous mixing). Inhomogeneous mixing occurs in most samples from ACE-ENA (regardless of homogeneous mixing frequencies increasing with increasing spatial resolution from ~100m to ~10 m), and is associated with decreased drop size relative dispersion and both greater aerosol and drop concentrations compared with homogeneous mixing. Precipitating clouds have a greater frequency of homogeneous mixing compared with non-precipitating clouds. The proposed methodology is similarly applied to in situ observations of Southeast Pacific stratocumulus, shallow convective clouds over Central Oklahoma and low-level clouds over the Southern Ocean. All four locations are primarily dominated by inhomogeneous mixing with minimal variability amongst each region.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D'Alessandro et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: