Joint inversion enhances inversion accuracy of resistivity and time-domain induced polarization, indicating better geological monitoring.
The resistivity method and time-domain induced polarization (TDIP) method are two branches of electrical geophysical prospecting. In recent years, researchers have implemented time-lapse resistivity inversion and time-lapse TDIP inversion based on time-lapse constraint theory. Although time-lapse inversion ensures temporal continuity between inversion results obtained at distinct epochs, it may not only cause the results to deviate from the true subsurface conditions, but also result in significant structural discrepancies resistivity and TDIP inversion results, thereby reducing inversion accuracy. To address these issues, the joint inversion of time-lapse resistivity and TDIP data was implemented based on cross-gradient constraint theory and time-lapse constraint theory. Using synthetic data from the theoretical model, we conducted separate inversion, time-lapse inversion, and time-lapse joint inversion. Comparative analysis of the results from these inversion schemes reveals that, compared with separate inversion and time-lapse inversion, time-lapse joint inversion not only maintains the temporal continuity of inverted models across consecutive monitoring epochs but also enforces structural similarity among distinct physical property models. This approach significantly increases the accuracy of the inversion results and exhibits superior noise robustness. These findings confirm the stability, reliability, and superiority of the algorithm developed in this study, providing a novel approach for addressing geological monitoring challenges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: