Survey reveals positive attitudes toward citizen science among natural resource practitioners in Florida, indicating its potential for enhanced biodiversity management.
Citizen science is a rapidly growing field increasingly used by varied organizations for scientific data collection and public engagement. However, the extent to which these data are used and by whom is less explored. Using Florida, USA, as an exploratory case study, we surveyed 232 natural resource practitioners in various state, county, and municipal government agencies, a university outreach office, and variety of non‐profit organizations to examine their citizen science usage, attitudes, and perceptions, as well as their citizen science usage barriers and challenges. Our findings reveal generally positive attitudes towards citizen science among both those who currently use it and those who do not, with usage patterns largely aligning with respondents' job roles. To better integrate citizen science in their roles, natural resource practitioners need tools for data collection and analysis, guidance on integrating citizen science into existing programs, and additional funding. By addressing these needs, organizations can enhance the quantity and quality of citizen science in their work, leading to improved decision‐making, advanced research, and expanded opportunities for meaningful public engagement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mason et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: