Research demonstrates a relationship between physical features and muscle fatigue time parameters, suggesting improved estimation models for individuals.
Muscle condition is evaluated primarily based on physical therapy; however, evaluation has not been quantitative. To quantify muscle fatigue, the authors previously derived and defined “muscle fatigue time,” which quantifies muscle fatigue using frequency analysis based on the surface‐ElectroMyoGram of the biceps brachii. The authors also constructed a muscle fatigue time estimation model based on the relationship between muscle fatigue time and muscle load for each participant. However, since the values of the model parameters differ from subject to subject, generalization of the model requires deriving the relationship between subject characteristics and the parameters. In this study, we attempted to select physical features that influence method parameters and estimate those parameters from selected physical features using multiple regression analysis. Percent body fat and biceps skinfold thickness were selected as physical features, and parameters were determined that yielded data with an error rate of approximately 13%. These results suggest that the variation in model accuracy between individuals can be eliminated using physical features.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakashima et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: