Proposed method uses machine learning to predict 3D flow fields from 2D cavitating flow data, suggesting significant implications for CFD.
A method is proposed for reconstructing spanwise cross-sectional data of a cavitating turbulent flow field around a 2D hydrofoil to a 3D flow field using supervised machine learning (ML). One of the variable of interest was the cross-sectional pseudo-measurement data of particle image velocimetry. Therefore, the spanwise component w of velocity was not obtained, that is, it cannot be input into neural networks (NN). To compensate for this, we introduced a mass conservation error into the loss function of machine learning. The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) data for the training were obtained using large-eddy simulation with a homogeneous fluid model for cavitation. The super-resolution convolutional neural network (SRCNN) was adopted for the supervised ML framework. As a result, under attached sheet cavitation mode, which corresponds to a quasi-steady condition, prediction was relatively simple. In contrast, under sheet/cloud cavitation mode, which is a strongly unsteady condition, the learning curve exhibited oscillations, suggesting that learning is difficult. Physical variables with a uniform distribution in the homogeneous spanwise direction can be reconstructed with high accuracy even under unsteady conditions, whereas the rotational components of streamwise vortices, which are non-uniform in the spanwise direction and have high spatio-temporal frequencies, fluctuate even under quasi-steady conditions, making them extremely difficult to reconstruct. When the loss function is augmented with a mass conservation error, the accuracy of w reconstruction is improved as the NN attempts to satisfy the conservation of mass.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kojima et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: