Narrative review reveals diverse factors contributing to depression, suggesting a biopsychosocial model's significance.
Background: Mental health is a critical component of overall well-being, yet it is often overlooked and stigmatized. Depression, a common mental health disorder, affects over 280 million people worldwide and contributes significantly to emotional distress, social withdrawal, and loss of productivity. Method: This narrative review synthesizes findings from scholarly literature across neurobiological, psychological, and sociological domains. Relevant peer-reviewed studies were selected to explore genetic, cognitive, and environmental factors contributing to depression. Theoretical models were reviewed for their clinical relevance and interdisciplinary coherence. Result: Theoretical integration shows depression as an emergent phenomenon from multilevel interactions. Neurobiological studies find that 60-70% of depressed individuals have hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysfunction. Psychological models highlight maladaptive cognitive schemas and emotional regulation deficits affecting 30-50% of patients. Sociological factors like chronic stress and social disadvantage increase depression risk by 2-3 times. These perspectives converge, indicating depression represents common final pathways of diverse causes, reflected in a global lifetime prevalence of about 15-20%. Conclusion: A biopsychosocial model best explains depression, emphasizing the interplay of biological, cognitive, and social influences. Future research should focus on personalized treatments addressing these interconnected factors to improve outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: