PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 16, 2025Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research2 citations

Influence of Bone Condition and Implant Design on Accuracy of Semi‐Autonomous Robotic Dental Implant Surgery In Vitro

View Full Paper
QTQian TangLWLinhong WangYDYude Ding

Key Points

  • Mean deviations of 0.58 mm at platform and 0.60 mm at apex underline the precision of semi-autonomous robotic placement.
  • Bone density most significantly impacted accuracy, with deviations highest in medium-density models (D2/D3) compared to both high (D1) and low (D4).
  • Cortical thickness showed a moderate positive correlation with implant deviations, suggesting its importance in surgical planning.
  • Self-tapping implants achieved lower deviations than non-self-tapping designs, highlighting the need for careful implant selection.

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of bone density, cortical bone thickness, and implant design on the accuracy of implant placement using a novel semi-autonomous robotic-assisted surgery system (sa-RASS). A total of 160 implants were placed in artificial bone models simulating four bone densities (D1, D2, D3, D4) and three cortical bone thicknesses (0.5, 1, 1.5 mm) using sa-RASS. Two implant designs (self-tapping and non-self-tapping) were evaluated under standardized cortical bone thickness conditions. The postoperative CBCT data and preoperative surgical plan were superimposed to calculate the deviations of the implant. Deviations were quantified for platform/apex positions (global, horizontal, vertical) and implant angulation. The sa-RASS achieved mean deviations of 0.58 ± 0.19 mm at platform, 0.60 ± 0.24 mm at apex, and 1.46° ± 0.78° for angulation. Bone density significantly influenced accuracy (p < 0.05), with maximum deviations in medium-density (D2/D3) models and minimal errors in high-density (D1) and low-density (D4) groups. Cortical thickness exhibited a moderate positive correlation with linear deviations (platform: r = 0.598; apex: r = 0.593; both p < 0.001). Self-tapping implants demonstrated superior precision compared to non-self-tapping designs (p < 0.05), with reduced deviations at both platform (0.48 ± 0.16 mm) and apex (0.49 ± 0.16 mm). This in vitro study demonstrated that bone condition and implant design significantly influence the accuracy of sa-RASS. Understanding these factors can help optimize robotic-assisted implant placement and improve clinical outcomes. Bone condition and implant design significantly affect the accuracy of robotic-assisted implant placement. Preoperative assessment and proper implant selection can enhance precision and improve clinical outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4539c31b076d99fa59720https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.70090
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper