Prospective study measures heart and respiratory rates in 703 healthy dogs, highlighting influences of age and season.
Background Wearable devices are increasingly used in human medicine to monitor various cardiovascular parameters and support heart health. Similar tools have recently emerged in veterinary medicine. However, their current limitation is the lack of large-scale data in healthy animals, a prerequisite for identifying potentially pathological variations using artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithms. Objectives To establish a large database of resting heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) recorded over extended periods using a commercially available biometric health-monitoring device in a large international cohort of apparently healthy (AH) dogs. Animals 703 AH dogs (median age [interquartile range] = 3.8 years [2.2–7.2]; body weight = 23.0 kg [14.8–31.8]). Methods Prospective observational study (2022–2025) including AH dogs of any age, breed, and sex, provided owners confirmed their dog’s apparent good health via a dedicated questionnaire. Results Median device wear time was 189.0 days [51.0–433.0]. Both HR and RR significantly decreased early in life, then stabilized, with a slight increase in older dogs. Both were also lower at night than during the day ( p < 0.0001). In dogs living in the Northern Hemisphere, HR and RR showed opposite significant seasonal patterns. Effects of sex, weight and breed were also analyzed. Conclusion and clinical importance This unique large-scale biometric study provides real-world reference data on resting HR and RR in dogs and the influence of intrinsic (age, sex, weight, breed) and extrinsic (circadian rhythm, season) factors on these vital signs, thus offering new insights into canine cardiorespiratory physiology under natural conditions, and laying the foundation for future AI-based detection of abnormal patterns.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chetboul et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: