Experimental analysis shows that thermal prestressing reduces deflection and tensile cracks in reinforced concrete structures, indicating a potential for improved load-bearing capacity.
Conventional strengthening measures for existing structures are usually not effective for the self-weight, which accounts for around 70% of the total load in reinforced concrete structures. Therefore, their effect on the overall load-bearing capacity is low. A self-weight-effective alternative for flexural strengthening is the thermal prestressing of additional reinforcement installed on the structure. In this method, reinforcing bars are slotted into the tensile zone, embedded in filler material, and tempered from the outside. They are thermally stretched, and once cooling starts, the bond with the hardened filler prevents re-deformation. The induced prestressing force counteracts dead loads and relieves the tensile zone, making the additional bars effective for the self-weight. In this paper, the effectiveness of the strengthening method is experimentally investigated in the serviceability and the ultimate limit states. Experiments involve strengthening a reinforced concrete beam under load by a thermally prestressed additional bar. Moreover, two reference tests are made to evaluate the method. An unstrengthened beam characterizes the lower capacity limit. Another beam with the same reinforcement amount as the strengthened one, but completely installed at casting, serves as the upper benchmark. All beams are loaded until bending failure. The strengthening method is assessed by means of the load-bearing behavior, deflection, crack development, and the strains in the initial as well as the added reinforcement. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the strengthening method. The thermally prestressed bar achieves an effective pre-strain of approximately. 0.4‰ by heating at about 70 °C. The induced prestressing force and associated compression reduce tensile cracks by approx. 45% and increase stiffness. The strengthened beam reaches the maximum load of the upper benchmark, but with about 33% less deflection. The filler, which also expands thermally, generates an additional prestressing force that is effective up to about 20% of the load capacity. Beyond this, the filler begins to crack and its effect decreases, but the pre-strain in the reinforcing bar remains until maximum load.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schwarz et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: