Observational analysis highlights the role of depressiveness and personality traits in women at risk of compulsive buying disorder.
Introduction Personality-related correlates are significant factors associated with compulsive buying. The Big Five personality traits can be a risk factor or a protective factor for addiction. Objectives This study aimed to establish the connection between depressiveness, workaholism, eating disorders, and personality traits, according to the five-point model called the Big Five, in women with a risk of compulsive buying disorder. Methods The study was conducted on 556 Polish women from the West Pomeranian Voivodeship. The study employed the diagnostic survey method using a questionnaire technique including Personality Inventory NEO-FFI, the Buying Behaviour Scale, the Beck Depression Inventory I-II, the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire, and a self-questionnaire. Results The analysis revealed the risk of compulsive buying being accompanied by a higher median score for depressiveness, neuroticism, Cognitive Restraint of Eating, Uncontrolled Eating, and a risk of workaholism. A lower score in the respondents in the compulsive buying risk group was observed in an assessment of agreeableness and conscientiousness. Work addiction was exhibited by 26% of people with compulsive buying disorder vs. 12% of people without it. Table 1. Descriptive statistics for selected scales with respect to the risk of the compulsive buying disorder. Selected Scales Total (n = 556) Norm (n = 483) Group 1 Risk of Compulsive Buying (n = 73) Group 2 p BDI I-II Me (Q1–Q3) 4.5 (1.0–10.0) 4.0 (1.0–9.0) 8.0 (1.0–15.0) 0.021 Neuroticism acc. to NEO-FFI, Me (Q1–Q3) 21.0 (15.0–28.0) 21.0 (15.0–28.0) 24.0 (20.0–32.0) 0.003 Openness to experience acc. to NEO-FFI, Me (Q1–Q3) 26.0 (23.0–31.0) 26.0 (23.0 -31.0) 26.0 (23.0–30.0) 0.774 Agreeableness acc. to NEO-FFI, Me (Q1–Q3) 30.0 (27.0–34.0) 31.0 (27.0 -34.0) 27.0 (24.0–32.0) <0.001 Conscientiousness acc. to NEO-FFI, Me (Q1–Q3) 34.0 (29.0–38.0) 34 (30.0–39.0) 30.0 (25.0–38.0) 0.028 Cognitive Restraint of Eating acc. to TFEQ-13, Me (Q1–Q3) 6.0 (4.0–8.0) 6.0 (4.0–8.0) 7.0 (5.0 -9.0) 0.004 Uncontrolled Eating acc. to TFEQ-13, Me (Q1–Q3) 5.5 (4.0–7.0) 5.0 (4.0–7.0) 7.0 (5.0 -8.0) 0.019 WART, Me (Q1–Q3) 53.0 (45.0–62.0) 51.0 (44.0–61.0) 60.0 (51.0–66.0) <0.001 Addiction to work acc. to WART, n (%) 79 60 (12.42%) 19 (26.03%) <0.001 BDI I-II—Beck Depression Inventory, NEO-FFI—Personality Inventory NEO-FFI, TFEQ-13—Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire, WART—Work Addiction Risk Test, Me—median, Q1—quartile first, Q3—quartile third, n—number of patients, p —statistic Conclusions This study found that a high risk of compulsive buying disorder is accompanied by a high risk of moderate depressiveness, neuroticism, Cognitive Restraint of Eating, Uncontrolled Eating, and workaholism. It also confirmed the view that compulsive buying is a behavioural addiction which is a consequence of ineffective coping and being dissatisfied with one’s social life. Disclosure of Interest None Declared
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rachubińska et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: