Comparative analysis shows AAC sandwich system enhances temperature stability, highlighting energy savings.
This study examines the dynamic response of autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) under solar radiation and ambient temperature coupling. A comparative analysis is conducted between traditional sintered bricks (brick), AAC, and autoclaved aerated concrete sandwich insulated wall panels (ATIM), using three thermal engineering models. The experimental group focuses on the south wall, with differentiated designs: Model A (brick), Model B (AAC), and Model C (ATIM). Temperature data collectors assess heat transfer and internal temperature regulation in winter. The results show that the AAC sandwich system significantly reduces thermal fluctuations, with a 26% and 14.8% attenuation in temperature amplitude compared to brick and AAC. The thermal inertia index of the AAC sandwich structure system is 51.5% and 14.58% higher than that of traditional brick walls and AAC walls, respectively. The heat consumption index of ATIM is, on average, 14% lower than that of AAC and 74.5% lower than that of the brick system. The study confirms that the AAC sandwich rock wool wall structure enhances temperature stability and energy efficiency, supporting green building and low-carbon energy-saving goals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: