Nationwide cohort study shows adding GLP-1 receptor agonists improves cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients, highlighting efficacy compared to DPP-4 inhibitors.
Background/Objectives: Selecting appropriate non-insulin hypoglycemic agents to complement insulin therapy is essential for achieving optimal glycemic control. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) plus insulin therapy on long-term cardiovascular and microvascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), with the goal of optimizing treatment strategies. Methods: Using Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database (2008–2021), we conducted a retrospective cohort study and identified 6779 propensity score-matched pairs of insulin-treated patients with T2D who initiated either GLP-1 RAs or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors. Cox proportional hazard models were applied to compare outcome risks between the two groups. Results: The mean follow-up was 3.45 years. Compared with DPP-4 inhibitor use, GLP-1 RA use was significantly associated with a reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (aHR 0.52, 95% CI 0.46–0.58), including hospitalizations for coronary artery disease (aHR 0.64, 95% CI 0.54–0.75), stroke (aHR 0.48, 95% CI 0.40–0.56), and heart failure (aHR 0.33, 95% CI 0.25–0.42). GLP-1 RA use was also linked to lower risks of major microvascular complications (aHR 0.42, 95% CI 0.35–0.50), end-stage kidney disease (aHR 0.08, 95% CI 0.04–0.14), sight-threatening retinopathy (aHR 0.62, 95% CI 0.50–0.76), leg amputation (aHR 0.16, 95% CI 0.05–0.57), and all-cause mortality (aHR 0.38, 95% CI 0.32–0.44). Conclusions: In this nationwide cohort, adding GLP-1 RAs to insulin therapy in patients with T2D was associated with significantly lower risks of cardiovascular events, major microvascular complications, and all-cause mortality compared with adding DPP-4 inhibitors. These findings suggest that incorporating GLP-1 RAs into insulin regimens may optimize treatment, lessen disease burden, and improve survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: