September 16, 2025ArchéoSciences

Cross analysis of good GPR data with archaeological excavation: case study of Sceaux-du-Gâtinais

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Interpretation errors were identified in GPR data related to archaeological findings, indicating the need for better methodologies.
3D interpretations of GPR data were plotted over a Gallo-Roman urban area with a sanctuary, revealing significant archaeological insights.
Archaeological feedback from excavations provided critical context for assessing the accuracy of GPR interpretations.
The study highlights the importance of integrating GPR surveys with traditional excavation methods to improve archaeological interpretation.

Implication

Cross analysis reveals interpretation errors in 3D GPR data from an archaeological site, suggesting improvements.

Abstract

A GPR survey has been carried out over a Gallo-Roman urban area with a sanctuary; 3D interpretations are plotted; Archaeological feedback highlights interpretation errors.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Simon et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d454d131b076d99fa5a80d https://doi.org/10.4000/14nrt

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Cross analysis reveals interpretation errors in 3D GPR data from an archaeological site, suggesting improvements.

Abstract

A GPR survey has been carried out over a Gallo-Roman urban area with a sanctuary; 3D interpretations are plotted; Archaeological feedback highlights interpretation errors.

Cross analysis of good GPR data with archaeological excavation: case study of Sceaux-du-Gâtinais

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Cross analysis of good GPR data with archaeological excavation: case study of Sceaux-du-Gâtinais

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading