What type of study is this?

This is a Experimental Study study (also classified as: Quantitative Study).

September 16, 2025ArchéoSciences

Before and after the dig. A middle Adriatic long-standing necropolis between non-invasive prospecting and excavation

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Excavation revealed critical insights into the necropolis, enhancing archaeological understanding through both methods.
Geophysical surveys and aerial monitoring effectively located the site, demonstrating non-invasive techniques' reliability.
The study compares non-invasive prospecting with excavation to assess their roles in archeological discovery.
Results suggest that both methodologies are essential for comprehensive archaeological exploration in historical sites.

Implication

This research demonstrates the effectiveness of geophysics and excavation in locating a necropolis, highlighting archaeological methods.

Abstract

Discovery of a necropolis (Iron Age-Roman period) through development-led archaeology, central role of geophysics, aerial monitoring and surface reconnaissance, excavations allow critical comparison between non-invasive and invasive methods

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Federica Boschi (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d454d131b076d99fa5a818 https://doi.org/10.4000/14nup

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

This research demonstrates the effectiveness of geophysics and excavation in locating a necropolis, highlighting archaeological methods.

Before and after the dig. A middle Adriatic long-standing necropolis between non-invasive prospecting and excavation

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Before and after the dig. A middle Adriatic long-standing necropolis between non-invasive prospecting and excavation

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study