Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 16, 2025Kanun Jurnal Ilmu HukumOpen Access

Legal Interpretation and Justice: Analyzing Court Decisions in Drug-Related Divorce Cases in Banda Aceh

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MIMuhammad IqbalGomal UniversitySASyahrizal AbbasUniversitas Islam Negeri Ar-RaniryAHAgustin HanapiUniversitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Analysis reveals discrepancies in court decisions regarding drug abuse in divorce cases, indicating legal interpretation influences outcomes.

Key Points

  • Discrepancies in court decisions mainly arise from varying interpretations of key evidentiary elements.
  • Judges employ authentic interpretation and analogical reasoning to align with Islamic law in their rulings.
  • The study utilizes normative research methodology through documentation and interviews for data collection.
  • Juridical, philosophical, and sociological perspectives are integrated to provide a holistic view of justice.

Cite This Study

Iqbal et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4565431b076d99fa5afddhttps://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v27i2.44968
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Judges Legal Reasoning on Child Welfare’s Perspective in the Hadanah Cases at Banten Religious Courts2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Reconstruction of Marriage Law: Judges’ Progressive Reasoning Based on Maqāṣid in Addressing Divergent Interpretations in Indonesian Courts2024 · 3 citations
  3. 3Analyzing Court Decisions on Interfaith Marriage: A Maqasid Sharia Perspective2024 · 2 citations
  4. 4Transforming Post-Divorce Alimony in Indonesian Religious Courts: A Maqashid al-Sharia Analysis2026
  5. 5Legal Discovery of Religious Court Judges in Marriage Itsbat Cases: An Effort to Reform Marriage Law in Indonesia2024