Field survey explores β-diversity and its environmental drivers in plant and microbial communities, indicating spatial scale significance.
The β-diversity, as the variation in community composition across habitats, is crucial for understanding regional community assembly and biodiversity conservation. While biogeographic patterns of both macro- and microorganisms have been well-documented, little is known about studies that simultaneously examine these patterns and their driving mechanisms across continuous spatial scales in both above- and belowground communities. Here, we conducted a field survey along a 1,700-kilometer transect across diverse landscapes, including meadow steppe, typical steppe, desert steppe, and inland dunes in the semi-arid region (aridity ranging from 0.66 to 0.83) of northern China to investigate the patterns and drivers of β-diversity in plant, bacterial, and fungal communities at continuous spatial scales. We found that organisms with various dispersal traits exhibited significantly different distance-decay relationships, with plants showing the steepest slope (–0.190), followed by fungi (–0.095) and bacteria (–0.061). Species turnover was the primary component of β-diversity across plant, bacterial, and fungal communities at various spatial scales. Furthermore, β-diversity, its turnover components, and β-deviation of plant, bacterial and fungal communities all showed significant and positive relationships with spatial scale. Moreover, environmental distance had a greater impact on β-diversity patterns than geographic distance. Among environmental factors, aridity emerged as the dominant driver significantly influencing the β-diversity of plant and microbial communities, with the strongest effect on the bacterial community. These findings provide essential insights into the mechanisms influencing β-diversity in both plant and soil microbial communities, highlighting the importance of spatial scale and environmental filtering in community assembly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: