This analysis demonstrates the effects of injection timing and pressure on combustion outcomes in spark ignition engines, indicating potential for reducing NH3 emissions.
As the global effort to reduce carbon emissions intensifies, ammonia has emerged as a promising fuel alternative due to its carbon-free molecular composition. This study explores the potential of direct liquid ammonia injection combined with port fuel hydrogen injection technology in a spark ignition engine, leveraging Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations informed by experimental data and literature. The methodology involves reproducing and validating an evaporation model sourced from the literature. Once validated, the fraction of injected liquid ammonia actively participating in combustion was quantified, an essential step in refining the engine combustion simulation. The engine model was divided into two key simulations: (i) a Volume of Fluid (VoF) simulation of the injector to characterize ammonia behaviour at the nozzle outlet, and (ii) an engine simulation utilizing a Lagrangian spray configuration, based on the VoF results and the validated evaporation model. The primary objective of this study is to analyse the impact of injection timing, injection pressure, combustion chamber geometry, and compression ratio on mixture formation and combustion propagation. A secondary focus is to mitigate direct contact between liquid ammonia droplets and the cylinder liner, thereby reducing lubricant degradation. The findings provide critical insights into optimizing injection strategies to enhance combustion efficiency while minimizing unburned NH3 emissions, offering a pathway toward more sustainable internal combustion engine technologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silvestrini et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: