Qualitative analysis reveals suffering and resistance mechanisms in Amazonian labor contexts, highlighting the need for sensitive care policies.
Objective: This study analyzes experiences of suffering and resistance at work in Amazonian territories. It seeks to understand how these experiences are narrated and elaborated in research developed within a Graduate Program in Psychology in Northern Brazil. Theoretical Framework: Psychodynamics of Work is used as the basis to understand ethical suffering and resistance mechanisms, articulated with critical and territorial epistemologies. Method: This is a qualitative and documentary research. Fifteen dissertations and theses defended between 2011 and 2024 were analyzed. The interpretative analysis organized the findings into four thematic axes: (1) workers on the margins; (2) centrality of Psychodynamics of Work; (3) methodological listening and suffering; (4) the Amazon as an analytical place. Results and Discussion: The results highlight a situated Psychodynamics of Work, sensitive to symbolic, institutional, and territorial inequalities. Symbolic forms of resistance such as humor, spirituality, collective bonds, and writing as self-care stand out. Ethical suffering emerges as a fracture between the gesture and the value attributed to work. Research Implications: The analyses provide insights for building clinical practices and care policies that are more sensitive to regional diversity and the subjectivity of Amazonian workers. Originality/Value: The study expands the field of Work Psychology by integrating it with Southern epistemologies, proposing a critical and situated listening to labor suffering and resistance in the Amazon.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uribe et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: