Cross-sectional study finds no correlation between self-efficacy and well-being in elderly hypertensive patients, indicating implications for medication access.
Aging is accompanied by physiological, physical, and psychological changes that lead to an increase in chronic diseases such as hypertension. Measures that enhance self-efficacy contribute to better blood pressure control and may also be related to psychological factors, helping to maintain mental well-being in elderly individuals. Thus, this study aims to determine the relationship between general self-efficacy and subjective well-being in elderly patients with hypertension visiting healthcare centers in Gorgan in 2023. This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2023 on 135 elderly individuals with hypertension referred to healthcare centers in Gorgan. Data on subjective well-being (Keyes) and general self-efficacy were collected using standardized questionnaires (Schwarzer). Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16, employing Pearson correlation, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney tests at a significance level of 0.05. The results showed that the mean of subjective well-being was 126.38 (SD=8.29), and for general self-efficacy, it was 25.82 (SD=2.91). There was no significant correlation between subjective well-being and self-efficacy (r= -0.06, P=0.460). However, there was a significant difference between subjective well-being and difficulty accessing medication (P=0.030), indicating that individuals with difficulty accessing medication had higher levels of subjective well-being. Additionally, self-efficacy was significantly related to residence location (P=0.010), with rural residents showing higher self-efficacy. It is recommended that strategies be designed and implemented to enhance subjective well-being and general self-efficacy in elderly patients with hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kabusi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: