Prospective observational study shows prevalence of abnormal cervical cytology in pregnant women, highlighting sociodemographic influences.
Background: Cervical cancer is the most common genital malignancy diagnosed during pregnancy. Pregnancy and postpartum follow up provides an opportunity for a woman of a reproductive age to implement cervical screening in patients of a young age. Aim: 1) To estimate the prevalence of abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy and postpartum. 2) To study the effect of sociodemographic factors on pap smear in pregnancy. Material & Methods: The study was conducted in OPD of obstetrics & gynaecology in GSVM medical college, Kanpur. Antenatal women between 21-45 years age from 10 to 34 weeks period of gestation were included in study. Patients with abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy were followed in postpartum. Results: 6.3%(n=32) of antenatal patients had abnormal cervical cytology where ASCUS is 2.0%(n=10), LSIL is 3.3%(n=17), HSIL is 1.0%(n= 5) and SCC is 0.0%(n=0). 93.7% (n= 478) of pap smear findings reported to be as negative for intraepithelial malignancy (NILM). 43.5% subjects had non precancerous lesions such as vaginitis(12.5%, n=64), cervicitis(3.9%, n=20), bacterial vaginosis(1.4%, n= 7), reactive cellular changes (1.6%, n= 8), pregnancy associated changes(23.9%, n=122) and vaginitis with leptothrix (0.2%, n=1). Around 47%(n=15) regression, 34%(n=11) persistence and 6.2%(n=2) progression of preinvasive cervical lesion was seen in postpartum period. Conclusion: Abnormal cervical cytology was mainly seen in pregnant women between 21-30 years and during second trimester in women with lower education and high parity. Pap smear is a reliable screening test and should be included in antenatal routine investigations due to high mortality rate in India. Most of the lesions regress in postpartum period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Srivastava et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: