Experimental analysis shows enhanced tumor uptake in models using glycosidase-cleavable linkers, indicating better safety profiles.
While radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) has become part of the standard-of-care for patients with advanced prostate cancers and neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), cures are elusive and normal tissue toxicity remain a challenge. Chemical groups susceptible to cleavage by enzymes present in tumors, tumor microenvironment or in normal tissues, have the potential to improve the therapeutic index for RPT. Using DOTA-TATE as an example and drawing from strategies used to develop antibody-drug conjugates, we designed, and synthesized, a chemically diverse series of linkers between the chelator (DOTA) and the targeting vector (TATE). Of the 10 agents we tested, two with cleavable linker domains reduced kidney retention compared to DOTA-TATE: the previously reported DOTA-MVK(ϵ)-TATE, and a novel agent bearing cleavable beta-galactose (β-Gal) unit, DOTA-β-Gal-TATE. In murine models of NETs, positron emission tomography (PET) was used to image yttrium-86 ( 86 Y)-labeled variants and show that, while the 86Y-DOTA-MVK(ϵ)-TATE exhibits similar tumor uptake to the parent non-cleavable 86 Y-DOTA-TATE, 86 Y-DOTA-β-Gal-TATE shows enhanced tumor uptake, resulting in up to 10-fold improvement in the tumor-to-kidney ratios compared to 86 Y-DOTA-TATE. In vitro and in vivo studies confirm high efficiency, enzyme-specific cleavage of 86 Y-DOTA-MVK(ϵ)-TATE and 86 Y-DOTA-β-Gal-TATE, supporting a key role for cleavable linker chemistry in the observed outcomes. RPT studies using actinium-225 ( 225 Ac)-labeled variants confirm that all agents are therapeutically effective and well tolerated. While both cleavable variants exhibit superior local control, overall survival, and more favorable toxicity profile when compared with 225 Ac-DOTA-TATE, 225 Ac-DOTA-β-Gal-TATE demonstrated lower nephrotoxicity. Our findings suggest a potentially generalizable strategy for improving the pharmacokinetics of radiopharmaceutical therapy agents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: