Abstract This paper provides a thorough analysis of the environmental and social risks associated with geothermal energy development. It highlights the interrelationships of these risks and explores ways to sustainably exploit geothermal energy. The paper examines the challenges and limitations of geothermal energy development and proposes solutions, technologies, practices, and policies to mitigate potential environmental impacts, enhance social acceptance, and ensure environmentally responsible production. The research includes a detailed review of scientific literature and case studies from several countries focusing on conventional and enhanced geothermal systems (EGS). The analysis addresses environmental risks, such as induced seismicity, water consumption, and air and water pollution, as well as social acceptance issues stemming from potential risks, trust deficits, and concerns about benefit sharing. The paper will assess the feasibility and scalability of various mitigation technologies, regulatory frameworks, and community engagement strategies. Geothermal energy is a renewable resource with significant potential, but it also presents environmental and social challenges. A major concern is the induced seismicity associated with EGS, in which fluids are injected into rock formations to fracture and increase their permeability, often triggering microseismicity. Strategies to mitigate this risk include pre-screening sites with detailed geological assessments and using adaptive management techniques that adjust injection parameters based on real-time seismic monitoring. Other strategies include implementing protocols with predefined thresholds for operational adjustments. Water consumption is another important environmental consideration, especially in water-stressed regions. Geothermal power plants can impact water quantity and quality, potentially contaminating aquifers with geothermal fluids or depleting freshwater resources. Solutions include optimizing drilling processes to minimize water use, promoting closed-loop binary cycle power plants that limit water consumption and evaporation, and researching alternative working fluids, such as supercritical CO2, to reduce water dependence. Public acceptance is essential for the successful implementation of geothermal projects. Community concerns often stem from perceived risks, limited understanding of geothermal technology, and lack of involvement in decision-making. Strategies to foster social acceptance include engaging with local communities early and transparently, establishing clear benefit-sharing mechanisms, offering educational programs to address misconceptions, and conducting thorough social impact assessments. Through synthesizing various case studies and conducting an extensive literature review, this research offers a comprehensive framework for sustainably utilizing geothermal resources while minimizing environmental impacts and ensuring social equity and community benefits. Considering the entire life cycle of geothermal projects—from exploration and development to operation and decommissioning—is crucial for mitigating potential risks and enhancing the long-term sustainability of this valuable renewable energy source.
AlGaiar et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: