PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 17, 2025Plastic Surgery6 citations

The Classification of Nerve Injury Revisited: Sunderland 0‐VI

View Full Paper
SPStahs PripotnevNLNoah S. LlanerasBTBob Teixeira

Key Points

  • Addition of grades 0 and VI enhances the Sunderland nerve injury classification framework.
  • Electrodiagnostic advancements and surgical options improve the understanding of nerve healing dynamics.
  • A simplified classification is presented, focused on prognosis, recovery time, and recovery degree.
  • Utilizing the updated framework may enable clinicians to better manage and prognosticate nerve injury patients.

Abstract

Introduction :Seddon and Sunderland's original nerve injury classification systems have stood the test of time over the last 70 years and continue to be widely used today. However, since those original descriptions, knowledge of nerve pathophysiology and healing has advanced, electrodiagnostic results have become more refined, and surgical options have increased. Methods : We offer a revisited review of the nerve injury classification to incorporate new knowledge for the modern era of nerve surgery. Results : We offer the addition of grades 0 and VI to the existing classification of nerve injuries based on Sunderland's framework, and we present a simplified classification that is patient and physician oriented, reflecting prognosis, time to recovery, and degree of recovery. Discussion : By following this nerve injury framework, clinicians can better assess, prognosticate, and manage patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pripotnev et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4567431b076d99fa5be3bhttps://doi.org/10.1177/22925503251375862
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper