This approach reformulates linear program constraints for potential heuristics, improving goal-awareness and overall efficiency.
In classical planning, admissible potential heuristics are computed by solving linear programs (LPs) with constraints expressing consistency and goal-awareness of the heuristic. Potential heuristics can return negative estimates. So, given a potential heuristic h^P, the actual heuristic used in search is another heuristic defined as h^P_0+(s) = max(h^P(s),0) for every reachable state s. In this paper, we reformulate the LP constraints for consistency of h^P so that they ensure consistency of h^P_0+ instead. This leads to more informative heuristics with positive impact on the overall performance in exchange for a more time and memory demanding computation using mixed integer linear programs instead of LPs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lauer et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: